Over the past four decades, index mutual funds and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) have been the index investment products of choice, a way for investors to get broad diversification for a relatively small price. But while these solutions are known to be tax-efficient, are there smarter ways of maximizing after-tax wealth?

Relative to the index, the after-tax returns for an ETF can be lower. Due to tax regulations, asset managers are only able to distribute capital gains, but not losses, which many clients find difficult to understand. However, by applying active tax management to an index-based separately managed account (SMA), some managers have been able not just to track the index on a pre-tax basis, but also to beat it after taxes.

Kevin Maeda, CIO of Active Index Advisors® (AIA), a division of Natixis Advisors, has been one of the pioneers of this strategy over the past 16 years. He explained that AIA strategies have been able to outperform many ETFs by using an index-based SMA structure as a core portion of their equity portfolios.


“The primary use is for people using this as simply tax-efficient beta1,” Maeda said. “This can be worth a significant amount, especially if you’re compounding that over time.”

Utilizing Losses Against Gains
While AIA has a similar dividend yield2 in its portfolios to an ETF, the concept behind the strategy is to defer gains and realize losses before utilizing those losses to offset gains from other investments, or from capital gains distributions.

This is done through a quarterly loss harvesting process across the entire portfolio. Taking an adjustable threshold of about 5% short-term losses, depending on the client’s individual tax rates, AIA’s algorithms sweep the portfolio, selling loss-making stocks and buying other securities in their place.

If there are no gains to offset in that particular year, losses can be carried forward as a tax-planning tool. Maeda pointed out that if clients anticipate having a large gain some time in the future – for example, selling a business in five years’ time – managers can utilize this strategy by having realized losses in place to offset those gains.

“All we’re doing is taking advantage of the tax laws where we hold on to the winners as long as we can and sell off the losers,” Maeda said.

In total, AIA works with more than 2,400 accounts. Maeda cautioned that aspects of the strategy can be misunderstood by clients. “When we talk about loss harvesting, people ask if we are trying to pick losers. We’re not – we’re simply picking diversified portfolios which track the index and take advantage of stock dispersion. If losers are there, we’ll take advantage of them, and we simply try to keep the winners on paper as long as we can,” said Maeda.

Keeping Costs Low
To keep costs low, AIA typically holds around 150 stocks, depending on the portfolio. The team estimates that this results in around one-fifth of the transactional volume of their competitors, and it means that when using brokerage-based fees (rather than asset-based fees), trading charges can be significantly lower.

In order to maximize after-tax returns for individual investors, Maeda said that AIA’s approach does not utilize a model portfolio. This also gives clients the ability to add their own customization features to the account – a level of flexibility which has proven important, with at least half of the clients choosing to set some sort of tax constraint.

“Clients can set a budget for the amount of capital gains being raised,” Maeda said, adding “Then we’ll realize gains up to the budget and only realize more if they can be offset with losses. This gives the client very fine tax control, so there are no surprises. Then in the future we can discuss if they’re comfortable raising more capital gains to get the portfolio closer to the index, if it’s not transitioning fast enough on its own.”

ESG Customization
In addition to tax constraints, many clients want further combinations of features such as socially responsible investing constraints. AIA subscribes to a range of screens, and Maeda said that there are two main ways to create a custom index for the client. Managers can apply negative screening to an index such as the S&P 500®3 and take out the stocks that a client doesn’t want, or alternatively choose proactive screening, building the portfolio using MSCI ESG4 ratings. “This is only possible because it’s non-model-based,” Maeda said. “You can’t buy this off the shelf, but you can build it here. Even if you have 100 clients with 100 different scenarios, we can build all of them because none of our accounts look alike anyway.”

Crucially, AIA has algorithms in place that automatically take care of the customization process, meaning that clients see no difference in fees between the default and custom options. However, manual intervention can take place in order to deal with conflicting constraints.

Transitioning Low Basis Portfolios
AIA index portfolios can enable tax-efficient portfolio transitions when transferring assets to a new portfolio manager. The problem with traditional options for transferring stock portfolios is that they do not always provide the flexibility for integrating existing holdings into a comprehensive portfolio solution, meaning that clients can be forced to liquidate assets. This then triggers substantial capital gains on the sale. To provide a less expensive and more tax-efficient route, AIA immediately loss harvests when positions are transitioned into its portfolios. This process will additionally sell off anything not in the index, before comparing the rest of the portfolio to the index. They will then target sector-neutral weights to detect whether sectors are overweighted and whether specific weights for individual securities are too large. After trimming those weights down, the proceeds are then invested back into the portfolio, with the aim of targeting sector-neutral weights and diversification across differently sized companies.

Concentrated Wealth Strategies
A more extreme version of this process can be applied to deal with concentrated stock positions, where clients holding concentrated stocks are reluctant to liquidate because of the resulting capital gains expenses. “There are two ways we work with this,” said Maeda. “If they fund the account with stock, they can give us a capital gains budget. We’ll build a portfolio around it and then loss harvest. So we’ll chip away at the concentrated stock until the client is OK to realize more gains.” The alternative is, over a finite timeframe, to dollar-cost average out of that position every quarter and into a completion portfolio. So it’s about gradually selling out of the stock and buying into the rest of the index to build diversification.

Maeda pointed out that the idea is simply to spread out the tax gains over multiple years instead of one, gradually building up a greater portion of the portfolio that acts as a loss-harvesting vehicle. The approach can be done flexibly with a portion of the client’s position at a time, rather than the whole position, in order to help them get over some of the psychological hurdles of the tax consequences. “It’s why we don’t recommend liquidating the portfolio then starting again, because all you’re doing is accelerating the taxes,” he said.

“If clients are using it as a core, they tend to reinvest in it over time. If you add more cash to it, you reset the basis, which allows you to get more loss harvesting. The harvesting does tend to diminish over time, but it never completely goes away because we are reinvesting dividends or we’re rebalancing the portfolio to keep it in line with the index.”
Tax-efficient beta refers to the potential of an investment strategy to account for both how an asset moves versus a benchmark and its possible tax implications.
Dividend yield is the ratio of a company's annual dividend compared to its share price.
The S&P (Standard & Poor’s) 500 Index® is an index of 500 stocks often used to represent the US stock market.
The MSCI ESG Indexes are designed to support common approaches to environmental, social and governance (ESG) investing, and help institutional investors more effectively benchmark to ESG investment performance as well as manage, measure and report on ESG mandates.
 
ESG: Environmental, social and governance (ESG) criteria are a set of standards for a company’s operations that socially conscious investors use to screen potential investments. Environmental criteria consider how a company performs as a steward of nature. Social criteria examine how it manages relationships with employees, suppliers, customers, and the communities where it operates. Governance deals with a company’s leadership, executive pay, audits, internal controls, and shareholder rights.
 
MSCI ESG Ratings help investors identify environmental, social and governance (ESG) risks and opportunities within their portfolio. MSCI researches and rates companies on a 'AAA' to 'CCC' scale according to their exposure to industry-specific ESG risks and their ability to manage those risks relative to peers.
 
SRI: An investment that is considered socially responsible because of the nature of the business the company conducts. Common themes for socially responsible investments include avoiding investment in companies that produce or sell addictive substances (like alcohol, gambling, and tobacco) and seeking out companies engaged in social justice, environmental sustainability and alternative energy / clean technology efforts. Socially responsible investments can be made in individual companies or through a socially conscious mutual fund or exchange-traded fund (ETF).
 
S&P 500® Index is a widely recognized measure of US stock market performance. It is an unmanaged index of 500 common stocks chosen for market size, liquidity, and industry group representation, among other factors. It also measures the performance of the large-cap segment of the US equities market.
 
Natixis Investment Managers includes all of the investment management and distribution entities affiliated with Natixis Distribution, L.P. and Natixis Investment Managers S.A.

Natixis Advisors, L.P. (“Natixis Advisors”) provides advisory services through its divisions Active Index Advisors® and Managed Portfolio Advisors®. Advisory services are generally provided with the assistance of model portfolio providers, some of which are affiliates of Natixis Investment Managers, L.P. Natixis Advisors, L.P. is located at 888 Boylston Street, Suite 800, Boston, MA 02199.
 
There are significant differences between SMAs and ETFs, including, but not limited to, minimum account size, cost, and liquidity. Please consider these differences before investing.
 
This material is provided for informational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice. There is no guarantee that objectives stated will be achieved.
 
All securities are subject to risk, including possible loss of principal. Please read the risks associated with each investment prior to investing. Detailed discussions of each investment’s risks are included in Part 2A of the firms’ respective Form ADV.
 
The views and opinions expressed may change based on market and other conditions.
 
The investments highlighted in this presentation may be subject to certain additional risks.
 
Natixis Investment Managers does not provide tax or legal advice. Please consult with a tax or legal professional prior to making any investment decisions.
 
This document may contain references to copyrights, indexes and trademarks that may not be registered in all jurisdictions. Third party registrations are the property of their respective owners and are not affiliated with Natixis Investment Managers or any of its related or affiliated companies (collectively “Natixis”). Such third party owners do not sponsor, endorse or participate in the provision of any Natixis services, funds or other financial products.
 
 
Over the past four decades, index mutual funds and exchange-traded
funds (ETFs) have been the index investment products of choice, a way for
investors to get broad diversification for a relatively small price. But while
these solutions are known to be tax-efficient, are there smarter ways of
maximizing after-tax wealth?
 
Relative to the index, the after-tax returns for an ETF can be lower. Due to tax regulations, asset managers are only able to distribute capital gains, but not losses, which many clients find difficult to understand. However, by applying active tax management to an index-based separately managed account (SMA), some managers have been able not just to track the index on a pre-tax basis, but also to beat it after taxes.
 
Kevin Maeda, CIO of Active Index Advisors® (AIA), a division of Natixis Advisors, has been one of the pioneers of this strategy over the past 16 years. He explained that AIA strategies have been able to outperform many ETFs by using an index-based SMA structure as a core portion of their equity portfolios.
 
“The primary use is for people using this as simply tax-efficient beta1,”
Maeda said. “This can be worth a significant amount, especially if you’re compounding that over time.”
 
Utilizing Losses Against Gains
While AIA has a similar dividend yield2 in its portfolios to an ETF, the
concept behind the strategy is to defer gains and realize losses before
utilizing those losses to offset gains from other investments, or from
capital gains distributions.
 
This is done through a quarterly loss harvesting process across the entire
portfolio. Taking an adjustable threshold of about 5% short-term losses,
depending on the client’s individual tax rates, AIA’s algorithms sweep the
portfolio, selling loss-making stocks and buying other securities in their place.
 
If there are no gains to offset in that particular year, losses can be carried
forward as a tax-planning tool. Maeda pointed out that if clients anticipate
having a large gain some time in the future – for example, selling a business
in five years’ time – managers can utilize this strategy by having realized
losses in place to offset those gains.
 
“All we’re doing is taking advantage of the tax laws where we hold
on to the winners as long as we can and sell off the losers,” Maeda said.
 
In total, AIA works with more than 2,400 accounts. Maeda cautioned that
aspects of the strategy can be misunderstood by clients. “When we talk about loss harvesting, people ask if we are trying to pick losers. We’re not – we’re simply picking diversified portfolios which track the index and take advantage of stock dispersion. If losers are there, we’ll take advantage of them, and we simply try to keep the winners on paper as long as we can,” said Maeda.
 
Keeping Costs Low
To keep costs low, AIA typically holds around 150 stocks, depending on
the portfolio. The team estimates that this results in around one-fifth of the transactional volume of their competitors, and it means that when using brokerage-based fees (rather than asset-based fees), trading charges can be significantly lower.
 
In order to maximize after-tax returns for individual investors, Maeda said that AIA’s approach does not utilize a model portfolio. This also gives clients the ability to add their own customization features to the account – a level of flexibility which has proven important, with at least half of the clients choosing to set some sort of tax constraint.
 
“Clients can set a budget for the amount of capital gains being raised,”
Maeda said, adding “Then we’ll realize gains up to the budget and only realize
more if they can be offset with losses. This gives the client very fine tax
control, so there are no surprises. Then in the future we can discuss if they’re comfortable raising more capital gains to get the portfolio closer to the index, if it’s not transitioning fast enough on its own.”
 
ESG Customization
In addition to tax constraints, many clients want further combinations of
features such as socially responsible investing constraints. AIA subscribes to a range of screens, and Maeda said that there are two main ways to create a custom index for the client. Managers can apply negative screening to an index such as the S&P 500®3 and take out the stocks that a client doesn’t want, or alternatively choose proactive screening, building the portfolio using MSCI ESG4 ratings. “This is only possible because it’s non-model-based,” Maeda said. “You can’t buy this off the shelf, but you can build it here. Even if you have 100 clients with 100 different scenarios, we can build all of them because none of our accounts look alike anyway.”
 
Crucially, AIA has algorithms in place that automatically take care
of the customization process, meaning that clients see no difference
in fees between the default and custom options . However, manual
intervention can take place in order to deal with conflicting constraints.
 
Transitioning Low Basis Portfolios
AIA index portfolios can enable tax-efficient portfolio transitions when
transferring assets to a new portfolio manager. The problem with
traditional options for transferring stock portfolios is that they do not always provide the flexibility for integrating existing holdings into a
comprehensive portfolio solution, meaning that clients can be forced to
liquidate assets. This then triggers substantial capital gains on the sale.
To provide a less expensive and more tax-efficient route, AIA
immediately loss harvests when positions are transitioned into its
portfolios. This process will additionally sell off anything not in the index,
before comparing the rest of the portfolio to the index. They will then
target sector-neutral weights to detect whether sectors are overweighted
and whether specific weights for individual securities are too large. After
trimming those weights down, the proceeds are then invested back
into the portfolio, with the aim of targeting sector-neutral weights and
diversification across differently sized companies.
 
Concentrated Wealth Strategies
A more extreme version of this process can be applied to deal with
concentrated stock positions, where clients holding concentrated
stocks are reluctant to liquidate because of the resulting capital gains
expenses. “There are two ways we work with this,” said Maeda. “If they
fund the account with stock, they can give us a capital gains budget.
We’ll build a portfolio around it and then loss harvest. So we’ll chip away
at the concentrated stock until the client is OK to realize more gains.”
The alternative is, over a finite timeframe, to dollar-cost average out
of that position every quarter and into a completion portfolio. So it’s
about gradually selling out of the stock and buying into the rest of the
index to build diversification.
 
Maeda pointed out that the idea is simply to spread out the tax gains
over multiple years instead of one, gradually building up a greater
portion of the portfolio that acts as a loss-harvesting vehicle. The
approach can be done flexibly with a portion of the client’s position
at a time, rather than the whole position, in order to help them get
over some of the psychological hurdles of the tax consequences. “It’s
why we don’t recommend liquidating the portfolio then starting again,
because all you’re doing is accelerating the taxes,” he said.
 
“If clients are using it as a core, they tend to reinvest in it over time. If you
add more cash to it, you reset the basis, which allows you to get more
loss harvesting. The harvesting does tend to diminish over time, but it
never completely goes away because we are reinvesting dividends or
we’re rebalancing the portfolio to keep it in line with the index.”
 
 
 
1. Tax-efficient beta refers to the potential of an investment strategy to account for both how an asset moves versus a benchmark and its possible tax implications.
2. Dividend yield is the ratio of a company's annual dividend compared to its share price.
3. The S&P (Standard & Poor’s) 500 Index® is an index of 500 stocks often used to represent the US stock market.
4. The MSCI ESG Indexes are designed to support common approaches to environmental, social and governance (ESG) investing, and help institutional investors more effectively benchmark to ESG investment performance as well as manage, measure and report on ESG mandates.
 
 
ESG: Environmental, social and governance (ESG) criteria are a set of standards for a company’s operations that socially conscious investors use to screen potential investments. Environmental criteria consider how a company performs as a steward of nature. Social criteria examine how it manages relationships with employees, suppliers, customers, and the communities where it operates. Governance deals with a company’s leadership, executive pay, audits, internal controls, and shareholder rights.
 
MSCI ESG Ratings help investors identify environmental, social and governance (ESG) risks and opportunities within their portfolio. MSCI researches and rates companies on a 'AAA' to 'CCC' scale according to their exposure to industry-specific ESG risks and their ability to manage those risks relative to peers.
 
SRI: An investment that is considered socially responsible because of the nature of the business the company conducts. Common themes for socially responsible investments include avoiding investment in companies that produce or sell addictive substances (like alcohol, gambling, and tobacco) and seeking out companies engaged in social justice, environmental sustainability and alternative energy / clean technology efforts. Socially responsible investments can be made in individual companies or through a socially conscious mutual fund or exchange-traded fund (ETF).
 
S&P 500® Index is a widely recognized measure of US stock market performance. It is an unmanaged index of 500 common stocks chosen for market size, liquidity, and industry group representation, among other factors. It also measures the performance of the large-cap segment of the US equities market.
 
Natixis Investment Managers includes all of the investment management and distribution entities affiliated with Natixis Distribution, L.P. and Natixis Investment Managers S.A.
Natixis Advisors, L.P. (“Natixis Advisors”) provides advisory services through its divisions Active Index Advisors® and Managed Portfolio Advisors®. Advisory services are generally provided with the assistance of model portfolio providers, some of which are affiliates of Natixis Investment Managers, L.P. Natixis Advisors, L.P. is located at 888 Boylston Street, Suite 800, Boston, MA 02199.
 
There are significant differences between SMAs and ETFs, including, but not limited to, minimum account size, cost, and liquidity. Please consider these differences before investing.
 
This material is provided for informational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice. There is no guarantee that objectives stated will be achieved.
 
All securities are subject to risk, including possible loss of principal. Please read the risks associated with each investment prior to investing. Detailed discussions of each investment’s risks are included in Part 2A of the firms’ respective Form ADV.
 
The views and opinions expressed may change based on market and other conditions.
 
The investments highlighted in this presentation may be subject to certain additional risks.
 
Natixis Investment Managers does not provide tax or legal advice. Please consult with a tax or legal professional prior to making any investment decisions.
 
This document may contain references to copyrights, indexes and trademarks that may not be registered in all jurisdictions. Third party registrations are the property of their respective owners and are not affiliated with Natixis Investment Managers or any of its related or affiliated companies (collectively “Natixis”). Such third party owners do not sponsor, endorse or participate in the provision of any Natixis services, funds or other financial products.
 

2545972.1.1