Central bank policy, geopolitics top expansive list of market headwinds
Even though they’re not worried about a recession in H2, Natixis strategists anticipate headwinds on almost every front.
Central bank policy (72%) and geopolitics (72%) draw the strongest consensus as headwinds. Bank policy concerns center around the question of how high and how long rates will remain restrictive before bankers declare victory over inflation.
Not all view it as a negative, and 22% go so far as to say policy may be a catalyst for markets as they may be looking at banks pausing hikes and ultimately cutting rates, which could spur growth.
Russia’s war with Ukraine continues to raise questions on the geopolitical front, especially following Turkey’s surprise decision to support membership for Sweden at NATO’s July meeting.
US-China tensions have been another concern in H1, but as 69% forecast, dialogue reopened in earnest in early July. Just how much progress will be made remains to be seen as it has been revealed that China hacked email within US Commerce Department prior to the resumption of talks.
Even as events unfold, one-quarter of those surveyed (25%) aren’t convinced that they will have a market impact, calling the geopolitical issues noise.
Employment (66%) ranks third among headwinds. This can be viewed in two ways: First, they may see labor scarcity as an impediment to growth; or second, they could be looking at slow growth and hear recession concerns and anticipate layoffs down the road.
Corporate earnings are also a concern as 66% of strategists see headwinds as earnings slow and the rally fades. One-quarter (25%) are more optimistic and project that earnings may actually serve as a catalyst.
Similarly, strategists are split on consumer spending. Half worry a slowdown in consumer spending will serve as a headwind, but 28% think consumers will continue to carry the market on their backs and provide a catalyst for continued growth.
While 41% believe that housing will be a headwind for markets in the second half, almost the same number (38%) believe concerns over a housing bubble are just noise. Another 22% take the opposite side of the argument and think there’s more room to run as they believe it will be a catalyst in H2.
Another 41% believe that US GDP, which OECD projects at 1.3%, will be a headwind. Despite the large number who are concerned, even more (44%) think GDP concerns are merely market noise.
Strategists call for US equity markets to lead, large caps to beat small caps
The headwinds are strong, but the largest number of market strategists (34%) believe the US is best positioned for what comes next and project markets there to come out on top at year end. Coming in far behind are the 22% that believe either Japan or Emerging Markets (Ex-China) will be the ultimate winner in H2. Fewer, 16%, think Europe will be the leader and only 6% believe it will be China.
Given the current dominance of big tech in market returns, strategists are calling for large caps (81%) to outperform small caps (19%). Adding to the odds against small caps are the tighter credit standards set in the wake of Q1’s banking crisis. Though there is no consensus on which of those stocks will be the ultimate winner, strategists are split 50/50 as to whether growth or value will outperform.
All tech. All the time.
While big tech has been a key driver of double digit returns in H1, no Natixis strategist anticipates that the rally will gain momentum in the next half, and only 6% think the rally will be a bubble that bursts. Instead, most (63%) anticipate the rally will fade by year end. A little less than one-third (31%) think the rally will continue to deliver steady results.
Much of the tech rally has been driven with the market’s fascination with the commercial implications of recent gains in artificial intelligence. Overall, Natixis strategists believe these advancements will be a net positive in the next 2 to 5 years, especially for investors and investment managers:
- 88% believe AI will unlock investment opportunities that were otherwise undetectable
- Three-quarters also believe AI will help them discover risks they did not previously know about
- Almost seven in ten (66%) think AI will alter traditional market patterns
- While they anticipate AI will change how they invest, only 19% think AI will take their jobs in the next 2 to 5 years
Despite the positives, those surveyed identified the negative implications of AI in markets. Much like the concern that AI can be used to manipulate political sentiment and voter behavior, strategists worry that investor behavior and market sentiment could be manipulated by bad actors, and 100% of strategists say AI will increase the potential for fraud and scams. Another 69% warn that AI will also accelerate day trading.
When it comes down to it, strategists are split on the investment opportunities presented by AI itself. Half think it will drive long-term growth, but the same number are looking at the build up and think it’s a bubble.
Recession: The headline that wasn’t … and still isn’t.
Of all the headlines that broke through in the first half of 2023, there is one that is notable because it never materialized: Recession.
Inflation, rising rates, and slowing growth have had market followers concerned about a potential recession for well over a year. In fact, in a survey conducted in November 2022, 59% of institutional investors believed “recession in 2023 was inevitable.” For some, the signal was so strong that 54% went so far as to say a recession was “absolutely necessary” to curb inflation.8
Recession concerns now cooler than institutions felt in Q4 2022
But here we are now: Markets have delivered solid to outstanding returns. Bonds are generating attractive yields. Inflation in the US has declined to just 3% and other countries are moving along the path to lower inflation.9 And Fitch Ratings raised its estimates for global GDP growth in 2023 from 2.0% to 2.4%.10
Given all these new developments, Natixis strategists express a cooler perspective on recession than their institutional peers did just seven months ago, and 78% of those surveyed project a soft landing for the economy versus a hard landing.
Rating the risk of recession in H2