Collective Investment Trusts (CITs) represent a sizable opportunity for 403(b) retirement plans, yet regulatory limitations have long prevented these plans from accessing the lower-cost, more flexible investment structure widely available in 401(k)s. When the Secure 2.0 legislation was initially passed in 2022, key provisions were omitted that would have enabled 403(b) plans to use CITs. Although discussions continued in subsequent years, progress remained slow and fell short of producing fully enacted legislation.
Against this backdrop, the case for expanding CIT access in 403(b) plans is straightforward. CITs provide meaningful advantages: lower fees relative to mutual funds, broader investment strategy menus, enhanced diversification, faster product creation, flexible plan level customization, and access to institutional vehicles common in 401(k) plans. Why shouldn’t all investors have access to these benefits? Millions of educators, health care workers, nonprofit employees, and other public service professionals stand to benefit if CIT access is fully authorized.
Compared with mutual funds, CITs typically provide broader investment menus, enhanced diversification opportunities, and greater flexibility for plan-level customization. As a result, they are widely used in the 401(k) marketplace.
Why regulatory barriers have persisted
Historically, 403(b) plans have been restricted from using CITs due to limitations in tax law and securities law. The SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 corrected only part of the issue, amending tax rules but leaving securities laws unchanged. In response, lawmakers introduced bipartisan bills in 2024–2025 aimed at fully permitting CITs in 403(b) plans. Industry groups, including asset managers such as Natixis Investment Managers, strongly supported these efforts.
INVEST Act (H.R. 3383) advances CIT access for 403(b) plans
Momentum increased meaningfully in December 2025 when the House passed the INVEST Act (H.R. 3383), which includes provisions to fully authorize CITs across ERISA governed, governmental, and nonprofit 403(b) plans. The next steps in the legislative process require Senate approval followed by a presidential signature before the changes can be implemented. The initiative has benefitted from bipartisan support, reflecting a broad recognition that 403(b) participants deserve access to the same cost efficient investment vehicles already common in other defined contribution plans.