Select your local site for products and services by region

Americas

Asia Pacific

Europe

Location not listed?

Equities

U.S. equities quarterly update

November 10, 2026 - 4 min

BILL NYGREN: I would say it rhymes much more with the tech bubble than it does the GFC. I think with the GFC, you had a lot of companies that had direct exposure to the housing market, and most of that exposure had been created with the expectation that housing prices would never decline. We saw it in the banking industry, the building industry, along with other related consumer exposure. 

What, to me, is reminiscent of what we went through in the dot-com bubble in '98 and '99, and then the ultimate correction in 2000–2001, is the intense focus on just one industry and similar client behavior in that almost all of our clients want to hear more about our thought process for not investing in specific companies as opposed to why we find the names in our portfolio attractive. 

We also found, back in '99–2000, investors thinking it was easy to make money in the market because all you had to do was go along the favorite names. And I think there's a similarity today where many investors think it was easy to identify AI winners several years ago. Those winners are still the expected winners. And if you just climb on board that train, you're likely to do quite well. 

We think one of the important differences relative to the dot-com bubble is the dot-come bubble was more about extended P/E multiples and newer business models that did not have much of an earnings history. Today, it's much more about established businesses that are going through an unprecedented cyclical boom. And the question is much more about what percentage of the earnings that they are achieving or enjoying today are likely to be sustainable. 

And if you believe that number is very high, a lot of the names that people talk about being in a bubble are actually quite reasonably priced.

Much like in 2000, we couldn't get comfortable with the popular names then because of P/Es. Today, we can't get comfortable because we can't convince ourselves that it's unlikely that earnings revert to levels they were just a couple of years ago. 

In their latest quarterly update, Bill Nygren and Bobby Bierig discuss the issues shaping equities in the United States. In the interactive conversation, they explore how they’re assessing today’s environment while staying grounded in a long-term, value-oriented investment approach.

This quarter, Bill and Bobby shared their perspectives on a market shaped by elevated valuations, concentration risk, and rapid developments in AI.

In this clip, Bill details his views on market dispersion and whether today’s environment might rhyme with the tech bubble.

Key takeaways

  • Market leadership can create opportunities beyond the most popular names. Concentrated investor attention may leave other attractive businesses overlooked or undervalued.
  • Periods of intense investor enthusiasm reinforce the importance of selectivity. Following market leaders may work for a time, but disciplined valuation can help manage the risk of changing environments.
  • Investors need to distinguish between durable profitability and earnings boosted by an unusually favorable cycle.

Discover what’s next

Turn our insights into actionable portfolio strategies.

The information, data, analyses, and opinions presented herein (including current investment themes, the portfolio managers’ research and investment process, and portfolio characteristics) are for informational purposes only and represent the investments and views of the author and Harris Associates L.P. as of October 2026 and are subject to change without notice. This content is not a recommendation of or an offer to buy or sell a security and is not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate.

Investing involves risk, including the risk of loss. Investment risk exists with equity, fixed income, and alternative investments. There is no assurance that any investment will meet its performance objectives or that losses will be avoided.

Investing in value stocks presents the risk that value stocks may fall out of favor with investors and underperform growth stocks during given periods.

NIM-10202026-vehzg4du