Natixis Investment Managers Solutions consultants monitor asset classes, investment products and market action, both in real time and from a historical perspective. See which trends impacted institutional asset allocation decisions at midyear in 2021.

#1 – Strong returns continue in 2021.
Most institutions started the year off in positive territory, with median endowment & foundation, public, and Taft Hartley plans each returning close to 3% in Q1. Corporate defined benefit plans were down 1.3% on average, due to their higher duration exposure and underweight to US equities.

Q1 2021 Performance by Percentile

Bar chart: Median performance Endowment & Foundation: 3.13%; Public: 3.18%; Taft Hartley: 3.14%; Corporate DB: -1.29%>

Average Allocation by Plan Type

Bar chart: Average Allocation by Plan Type: E&F: 35% US equity, 23% US fixed income; Corp DB: 23% US equity, 34% US fixed income

Source: Investment Metrics

#2 – Asset flows driven by rebalancing requirements.
June 2021 was the eighth consecutive month in which the MSCI ACWI outperformed the Bloomberg Barclays Aggregate Index – the second longest streak in the past 30 years. This forced institutions to sell equity and add to fixed income in order to rebalance back to targets. A hypothetical 60/40 portfolio with no rebalance in the prior 12 months would have been 9.3% overweight equity at 3/31/21 and 7.5% overweight equity at 6/30/21. Top institutional flows in Q1 were to core fixed income, STRIPS (Separate Trading of Registered Interest and Principal of Securities), core plus, and short duration government/credit. Notably, Q1 2021 was the first quarter with long duration inflows since Q3 2018.

Equity overweight: 60/40 rebalanced 12 months prior

Line chart: Equity overweight for 60/40 portfolio rebalanced 12 months prior, 6/30/91-6/30/21
Sources: Factset, eVestment

#3 – Bailout for multi-employer plans.
As part of the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 passed in March, over 100 of the most troubled multi-employer plans are set to receive an $86 billion bailout package in July 2021. While it is expected that the majority of the bailout will be restricted to safer asset classes like US investment grade bonds, the new infusions could have important implications for the target risk level and optimal asset allocation of those plans’ remaining assets.

#4 – Timber!
Lumber prices soared during the “Stay at Home” economy, before coming back to earth late in Q2. However, the strong returns have not necessarily accrued to timberland investors. Supply-demand imbalances combined with the high upfront costs of opening new sawmills have meant existing mill owners enjoyed sizable gains while the various landowners, including many institutional investors, have struggled to keep up.

Lumber prices have outpaced timber prices since 2020

Chart: Timber price vs. lumber price indexed to 100 on 1/1/15: lumber has outpaced timber since 2016; by 388 points at 6/30/21
Sources: The World Bank: CMO Historical Data Monthly: World Bank Commodity Price Data (The Pink Sheet)  Bureau of Labor Statistics

#5 – Outsourced CIO activity spikes.
Institutions are increasingly looking for strategic partnerships to address portfolio management needs. US OCIO (Outsourced Chief Investment Officer) assets grew 20.1% in the year ending 3/31/21, boosted by strong investment returns and an influx of new mandates. Common reasons for outsourcing include lack of internal resources, better risk management, additional fiduciary oversight, and faster implementation/decisions. Due to a large but maturing base of defined benefit pension clients, OCIO providers are increasingly seeking opportunities to partner with other client types including endowments, foundations, and healthcare systems.

OCIO Mandates by AUM (% of Total)

Bar chart comparing OCIO mandates by % of total for Defined Benefit, Defined Contribution, E&F, Healthcare, and Other
Sources: InvestmentNews, Pensions & Investments, Chief Investment Officer
CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are registered trademarks owned by the CFA Institute.

This content is provided for informational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice. Any opinions or forecasts contained herein reflect the subjective judgments and assumptions of the author only and do not necessarily reflect the views of Natixis Investment Managers, or any of its affiliates. There can be no assurance that developments will transpire as forecasted and actual results will be different. Data and analysis does not represent the actual or expected future performance of any investment product. We believe the information, including that obtained from outside resources, to be correct, but we cannot guarantee its accuracy. The information is subject to change at any time without notice.

The MSCI ACWI SMID Cap Index captures mid and small cap representation across 23 Developed Markets (DM) and 26 Emerging Markets (EM) countries. With 7,314 constituents, the index covers approximately 28% of the free float-adjusted market capitalization in each country.

The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index is a broad-based index that covers the U.S.-dollar-denominated, investment-grade, fixed-rate, taxable bond market of SEC-registered securities. The index includes bonds from the Treasury, government-related, corporate, mortgage-backed securities, asset-backed securities, and collateralized mortgage-backed securities sectors.

Index information contained herein is derived from third parties and is provided on an “as is” basis. The user of this information assumes the entire risk of use of this information. Each of the third party entities involved in compiling, computing or creating index information disclaims all warranties (including, without limitation, any warranties of originality, accuracy, completeness, timeliness, non-infringement, merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose) with respect to such information.

Investing involves risk, including the risk of loss. Investment risk exists with equity, fixed income, international and emerging markets. Additionally, alternative investments, including managed futures, can involve a higher degree of risk and may not be suitable for all investors. There is no assurance that any investment will meet its performance objectives or that losses will be avoided.