The quickest, sharpest decline in history has been followed by the quickest, sharpest rebound, so the question now is: Where do we go from here? In this article we take a look back at the history books and call on some veterans of the industry to help understand what the road to recovery might look like.

Key Highlights:
  • Looking back, history suggests a V-shaped market recovery is rare. And recoveries take time.
  • Timing markets has proven almost impossible, and the ongoing uncertainty surrounding the current situation is unlikely to make this easier.
  • Nonetheless, we look to the future and start to build positions for the ‘after-corona’, gradually and with the patience to find attractive entry points, without trying to time the bottom.
  • Looking beyond the immediate recovery, we are likely to see some long-term legacy from this crisis as well.
  • In the current context, humility and risk management are key words.

It is impossible to predict events like 9/11 or COVID-19. The good news is you don’t have to actually predict these events to be prepared for them.

~ Aziz V. Hamzaogullari, CFA®
Chief Investment Officer and Portfolio Manager
Loomis, Sayles & Company

Featured Affiliate Contributions:


Growth: Aziz Hamzaogullari, Loomis, Sayles & Company

It is impossible to predict events such as 9/11 or COVID-19. And we believe that it is futile to try and estimate how long they will last and how deep the impact might be. The good news is however that you don’t have to predict these events to be prepared for them. There’s no such thing as a ‘risk on’ day or a ‘risk off’ day, as if investors allocate capital rationally one day and not the next.

The best preparation requires a disciplined approach to doing the right thing every day. If you look at any profession, those who are successful are both disciplined and consistent. At the top of a cycle people tend to think very long term. They start talking about ‘the next decade’. Conversely, at the bottom of the cycle they tend to focus on the next quarter and forget about the next 10 years.

We allocate capital every day in the way that, we believe, everyone should allocate capital–with an informed view of risk reward. If you truly understand the importance of this relationship, you should be prepared for whatever tomorrow may bring.

As a result, this environment has provided us with some tremendous investment opportunities. There has been more activity in the portfolio than there has been in a long while. Typically, we invest in one or two companies per year, but recently we have invested in five new businesses, which is a significant amount of activity for us.

And when we buy, we buy with the intention of being truly long-term investors. In fact, we have analysed the holding period of our portfolio companies in the past and it is longer than 98% of the peer group. These are the times that define portfolios for the next 10 years. Investors should take full advantage of them, but do so by acting rationally.

Growth: Léa Dunand-Chatellet, DNCA

Investors had to face in the past weeks to an extreme volatility and the steep sell-off in equity markets due to Covid-19 pandemic. While the situation remains uncertain and impact on companies’ valuations and earnings is not fully identified, dislocations created by the downturn and potential implications for an eventual recovery should be taken into consideration by investors. Besides managing portfolios in highly volatile markets with a deep global recession ahead, investors must also think about “the day after”. During Q1 2020, European equity markets plunged into bear market territory faster than ever before. The Stoxx Europe 600 Index dropped by -22.57%% (Stoxx Europe Value by -28,46% and Stoxx Europe Growth by 17,06%). No sector was spared, energy stocks and financials were hardest hit.

Lower-beta stocks and higher-profitability stocks fell less than the market. Companies with low leverage performed better than companies with higher leverage. Growth stocks outperformed value. And large-cap outperformed small-cap. But stocks with high dividend yields, usually seen as defensive, underperformed amid concerns that companies may cut payouts. Resilient sectors in past downturns - real estate and utilities - did not protect portfolios to the same degree as in the past.

While European stock valuations are well their historical average, it is difficult to see what the post-Covid-19 world will look like and what types of stocks will lead the recovery. Supply chains disruption may accelerate manufacturing changes that were already underway. Companies global business models focused on generating incremental revenues and profits with fewer assets and inventory could be challenged in favour of more robust and regional supply chains that may have higher cost. Consumer behaviour may also change. Tourism and travel may never get back to their pre-crisis levels. Healthcare spending could increase in new areas of research and development. Technology enablers of remote working and learning could be boosted.

We expect new technologies (robotization, energy efficiency, cyber security, big data, Artificial Intelligence) and health sectors to be well positioned on secular long-term growth trends. Companies with strong balance sheets, healthy margins, established and sustainable cash flows, and lower financial leverage should be better positioned.

Value: Bill Nygren, Harris Associates

On average, the S&P 500 has taken 8 months to reach new 52-week highs after bottoming out. It’s not clear that we have seen the bottom yet in 2020, but it is clear that it will take time to get back to where we were. It is easy for investors to become obsessed by shortterm price movement, but the underlying value of a business does not move as swiftly as stock price or often with as much magnitude.

As we entered the shutdown, the S&P 500 traded at a 2020 GAAP P/E ratio of around 23x, which, converting earnings to cash flow, means the typical company was expected to generate 4%-5% of its market cap in 2020 cash. Mathematically, most of the total value of a growing company comes from the aggregate cash it will generate in the years 2023-2050 and beyond.

If cash flows dropped to $0 for the entirety of 2020, the aggregate value of market should fall by about 5%. We do not believe cash flows will completely fall to $0 for the year. However, we have seen the stock market drop far more dramatically than 5%.

The truth is that it is still too soon to know what will happen. Shutting down the economy will certainly cause a severe drop in GDP, but even draconian scenarios should not frighten long-term thinkers. These types of dislocations provide opportunity for strong performance for those who are patient to weather the storm.

It’s worth remembering that a litany of frightening events have occurred over the past three decades and yet the S&P 500 has increased 11-fold. The question investors should be asking themselves is ‘How much will this affect the long-term cash flows of businesses?’. Beware of extrapolating near-term costs into perpetuity.

ESG & Thematics: Jens Peers, Mirova US

During the crisis, we’ve seen that many ESG strategies have seen inflows while non-ESG strategies on average have experienced outflows. By taking a longer term view and focusing on companies that are believed to help create a more sustainable future, most ESG strategies, including ourselves, have little to no investments in some sectors which have underperformed the most during the coronavirus crisis, such as fossil fuels, tourism, aviation and financials. On the other side, a preference for health care stocks and companies with on average lower levels of debt compared to the broad market, certainly helped as well.

Looking ahead to any potential recovery or normalization, long-term trends–demographic, technological, environmental and governance-related transitions–will continue to drive performance. We’ll still need to adapt to urbanization and invest in solutions for climate change–even though we’ve seen that pollution and CO2 emissions have actually been lower during the crisis.

However, we’re also going to see an acceleration of the digitalization of our economy. Many people are now used to doing video conferences, working from home and ordering things online, but many businesses are starting to think about that a lot more too.

Supply chain management will also be increasingly important. We’ve seen that Wuhan is probably the global production center for many different industries, including many basic components for pharmaceuticals and the car manufacturing industry. Centralizing all your production centers in one specific city can lead to significant disruptions in your supply chain management, so companies that have a wider distribution or sourcing network will continue to benefit in the future.

I think it’s really important to construct your portfolios around the things that you’ll believe will create a sustainable, long term future. That’s why we only invest in the companies we like–and we like them because they have the right products to benefit from these important long-term trends, they are well managed and they don’t take irresponsible risks.

ESG & Thematics: Karen Kharmandarian, Thematics Asset Management

The current period has only served to highlight structural currents that have been reshaping the economic landscape over the past years. The change in company leadership does not simply reflect a passing fad, but points towards the increasing role that technology has to play in our daily lives, whether that be related to work, consumption or leisure.

By way of illustration the representation of technology related stocks in global equity indices has almost doubled over the past 7 years. Economic agents will also likely adapt accordingly to the current situation and that may mean addressing consumption patterns and some views on what sovereignty means for governments. Looking long term that could represent an attractive opportunity for investors that thoughtfully capture the emergence of these new themes and focus selectively on firms that are likely to be prime beneficiaries.

The robustness and quality of business models that offer solutions to adapt to an evolving world have demonstrated their resiliency by providing higher revenue visibility associated with attractive growth prospects and sound balance sheets. However the active manager’s role will be to sort the wheat from the chaff, in other words identifying firms well positioned to benefit from long term trends rather than stocks that are responding simply to short term interest

Fixed Income

US: Dan Fuss, Loomis, Sayles & Company

By background and by habit I like to buy into severe market declines. This is unlikely to be a smooth recovery and there will be substantial bumps along the way.

I would say our official outlook is certainly to be hoped for. That is that the recovery will not be V-shaped, but a very big U i.e. we go down very, very sharply. And then, as the impact of the virus starts to pass and activity gradually returns, we start the upswing. There’s not an immediate rebound, but a gradual uptrend in the economy.

As such, I can understand people buying equities right now. I can even see the attraction of investment grade if you feel the Fed is going to keep buying for a long time. But, I think we have to be particularly careful on credit. A lot of the earnings models will need to be changed. Many cost structures are not flexible enough for significant reductions in revenues; especially when revenues fall faster than costs can be adjusted. From a cashflow standpoint, once you go negative, that’s a real headache.

Mentally, I’m preparing for inflation because I think there’s a real risk that it will return. Do we have the tools to fight it? Yes. Would we be willing to slow the economy again in order to stem it? The answer there is less clear cut, especially when total revenues are far short of expenses. I expect inflation to be comparable to the ‘50s and ‘60s, where it crept in at first and then at a point, started to accelerate. I don’t anticipate a return of the conditions experienced in the late ‘70s, at least not in the U.S. But then again, it is very hard to isolate ourselves from the rest of the world.

European: Philippe Berthelot, Ostrum Asset Management

Nearing the end of April, one can notice that the bulk of risky assets has recovered more than half of the slaughter in prices that occurred since mid-March 2020. IG and HY corporate bonds are still lagging in this respect. But one could wonder whether or not credit as a whole is the right place to be in such turmoil as the global economy is entering into its largest contraction wince WWII! Let’s not hide the fact that credit will be featured with further waves of downgrades (€50 bn to €80 bn for € IG) including several fallen angels but as we can see, a lot of it is already priced in at current levels. On top of it, we do not foresee default rates skyrocketing like in the US but rather a rise to 7.5% by year-end at worst (much above 10% for the US default rate because of the Shale oil sector massacre to come).

This is a crucial moment when active investments can make the difference vs passive investments: active sector allocation and active issuer picking will be key in the end: some issuers will suffer like hell or eventually vanish in the case of bankruptcy. Even if we’re still navigating into uncharted territory, with some genuine uncertainty about the letter defining the recovery to come (U, V, L or W shape?), we are constructive on credit at current levels for both IG and HY in Europe (1.5% yield in IG vs -0.5% for the 5 y German Sovereign bond).

What’s next? This all-time unknown pandemic crisis, will have structural consequences comprising a shift from global to local supply chains: the «just in time» rule with zero inventories will soon be replaced by the « Just in case » one. Let’s forget about the double digit ROE obsession for CEOs or CFOS! The short-term earnings focus will morph into longer one, combining a robust and quality focus for employees, clients or providers including much more green consumerism, i.e. a ‘sustainable’ Capitalism: welcome to Capitalism 2.0!


Volatility: Simon Aninat, Seeyond

The reality is that some of the recent corrections have occurred extremely quickly and the reversals have often been equally sharp. This can lead to some CTAs, managed futures and trend following strategies, which often rely on a trend to be somewhat prolonged to capture the momentum, not only missing out on the correction but also to risk playing catch-up and being incorrectly positioned in a reversal.

When you look at traditional diversification opportunities, there remain very few compelling options in the current environment. Bonds have historically been the obvious hedge for the equity portion of a portfolio, but with so much debt around the world trading at record low yields, it is questionable whether this is still the case.

While the trajectory of the recovery from the equity markets’ lows we have seen in March 2020 is uncertain, history suggests that it may be a bumpy ride – especially in the early stages. Even if we’ve already seen elevated spikes of volatility, there is still potential for a volatility strategy to provide diversification and alpha to investor portfolios, both now and over the coming years.

Indeed, a strategy that is contrarian on volatility, buying low and selling high, would benefit from a bumpy ride of Equity markets by dynamically adjusting its volatility exposure. This can provide comfort to investors that want to use volatility as a diversification strategy.

It is very difficult to provide a specific figure with respect to allocations of such a strategy in portfolios. All investors and portfolios are different and therefore an investment would need to be aligned with the associated risk tolerance and/or time horizon. However, what we can say based on conversations that we’ve had with clients is that a volatility strategy can typically represent up to 10% of the equity portion of a portfolio.

Private Debt Real Assets: Denis Prouteau, Ostrum Asset Management

The impact of the crisis: too early to tell
The current situation is much more acute than previous crises, but the full impact on valuations remains to be assessed. There have been upwards margin revisions, integrating higher bank funding costs, but the price discovery process has only started. There isn’t currently enough data to confidently take advantage of new opportunities across our three expertise–but we are prepared for when the dust settles.

Infrastructure: resilient in periods of crisis
Infrastructure debt has proven very resilient throughout crises - energy, water, telecom and transportation remain vital. We anticipate some downgrades for the riskiest sectors and transactions; however, we do not expect major payment defaults in 2020, at least not in Europe. The infrastructure projects in our portfolios generally benefit from a comfortable cash buffer which should help weather a prolonged slowdown. This crisis could change things taken for granted in the past. For example, green energy projects in the context of extremely low fossil fuel prices. Will governments still prioritize sustainable infrastructure even when economies are contracting, and unemployment is at an all-time high? This crisis forces our teams to consider much broader risk factors–experience from previous crises is essential to properly managing and monitoring existing transactions. In terms of potential opportunities, health infrastructure could see more attention, with more public institution involvement.

Real Estate: acceleration of certain trends
Secular trends could be accelerated or triggered. For example, the retail sector could see an acceleration of e-commerce, particularly for groceries, promoting the shift towards a flexible omnichannel model. This would not necessarily be to the detriment of small, local retailers, which have proven their utility during this crisis. Offices could see imposed remote working push corporates to reconsider work space volume, with a greater focus on well-being and productivity. There will also be increased demand for technology integration, particularly PropTech (property technology) and MedTech (medical technology), impacting all aspects of life and business.

Aircraft: turbulence ahead
This recovery looks more challenging than past crises, and difficulties may linger until Q3 2021. Nevertheless, markets seem confident in airlines’ capacity (at least the largest ones) to face the crisis thanks to their respective governments’ support. Currently, investment opportunities arise from airlines aiming to secure their cash position, either through unsecured transactions or through the financing of unencumbered aircraft. These opportunities must be examined cautiously: aircraft values have not yet evolved, credits have not yet deteriorated, margins have evolved but can still increase. Once the situation has stabilized, there will be some opportunity to invest in aircraft secured debts with new market standards (in terms of Loan to Value (LTV), covenants and margins), based on lower aircraft values.