Investors fail the complicated math behind bonds
With inflation holding on, higher interest rates may linger longer. But at some point, rates will come down. Few investors know what it means for bonds. Overall, 62% claim to understand how rates impact bonds, although those in Australia (42%) and the Germany (50%) were significantly less confident.
To test how much they understand about rates and bonds, we gave our investors a quiz. We asked what happens to bonds when rates are cut. We gave them four possible answers: If rates are cut, will the value of bonds you own now go up or down? And if rates are cut, will the income from bonds you buy in the future be higher or lower? The question allowed respondents to make multiple selections and also offered the option to select, “I don’t know.”
The correct answer has two parts: 1) The value of the bonds owned now will increase because a higher rate will be more attractive to other investors, and 2) the new lower-rate bonds will generate a lower level of income.
When it comes down to it, the math is tricky and includes inverse relationship. Only 3% of the 7,050 investors surveyed got it completely right. Just 226 people in that panel knew that a rate cut would mean the value of bonds they own at the current interest rate would go up (33%), and that bonds bought after the cut would have lower income potential (15%). In the end, about one-quarter of those surveyed took the out and said I don’t know.
Despite the confusion, 48% of those surveyed own bonds, and they are willing to learn more about them. Overall, 65% say they understand the role of bonds in portfolios. As it stands, 41% plan to invest more in bonds over the next year. However, most telling about the relationship investors have with the math behind bonds are the 60% who say it’s just more fun to invest in stocks.
Private markets hold strong allure as stocks and bonds stumble
With public markets off to a shaky start, investors are looking elsewhere for opportunity in 2025. Much like institutional investors, the individuals we surveyed are focusing on the potential for private markets to enhance returns and enhance diversification.
As they learn about how professional investors have been turning to real estate to private equity to private debt and infrastructure, 44% of investors globally say the more they read about private assets, the more they want to invest. Globally, 40% say they’re already invested.
Overall, 65% say they understand some key differences between public and private markets. They recognize that private assets have a higher fee. However, 50% globally believe the returns are worth the additional expense. Performance potential is a key part of the appeal, as 34% say they feel like they’re missing out on the best opportunities, such as SpaceX and OpenAI, by limiting themselves to public markets.
They also realize that private investments present some unique hurdles, but the intricacies can be confusing. Six in ten (61%) know that private assets require special tax reporting. And while 56% say they are interested in private investments, they are worried about liquidity. But only half know that private investments require long holding periods. Another 58% think that private assets are priced daily, which they aren’t – a key point of distinction from public markets.
But the biggest point of distinction comes in knowing who can actually invest. Overall, 60% of investors surveyed believe they are eligible to invest in private assets. But there are significant differences between Europe, Asia, Latin America, and the US when it comes to private investing.
Europe:
LTIF and LTAF fund structures are democratizing private assets, giving investors access to the market through evergreen funds, offering some degree of liquidity. This is why 46% of investors have already invested.
Latin America:
The region’s regulatory environment encourages private investment with bilaterial investment treatise to help safeguard private investments and enhance fiscal-rule compliance. Coupled with the region’s infrastructure needs and demand for private financing indicates why 53% of investors there are invested.
Asia:
Regulatory frameworks in many countries can be complex and restrictive. And a less robust private market overall has limited private investment among those in the region to just 29%.
The US:
Private investment is often limited to sophisticated institutional investors and accredited investors who meet financial and other requirements. That is why only 24% of those surveyed in the US are currently invested. Based on the asset-level qualifications alone, US investors are confused about who is eligible to invest: 63% of those with $501,000–$1M in investable assets think they’re eligible, as do 66% with $300,001–$500,000, and even 54% of those with $100,000–$300,000.