Conventional wisdom has long held that investing in small-capitalization stocks typically rewards investors with excess returns. Generally speaking, the historical record supports this principle, as small caps have outperformed large caps over most extended market periods. However, structural changes have emerged in the small-cap universe that imply the returns of the past may not extend to the future.
The small-cap universe has traditionally been fertile ground from which relatively young, promising companies can raise capital. The public markets have typically offered depth, liquidity and valuations at a considerable premium not easily found in the private market. These benefits have outweighed the demands placed on public companies: reporting requirements, quarterly scrutiny, and often steady pressure from investors to meet growth and profitability targets.
Over the past two decades, regulatory changes and a significant expansion of private equity funding have altered the cost-benefit profile of public equity. As companies remain private longer, the small-cap universe suffers a decline in the replenishment cycle. Historically, a steady influx of new companies has been instrumental in continually invigorating the small-cap universe with opportunities; however, the inflow of new public companies has slowed markedly.
Furthermore, the composition of the IPO market changed. From 1980 to 2000, small firms represented 61% of all IPOs. Between 2001 through 2025, only 43% of IPOs comprised small companies.
Fewer small companies are going public